PRESENTATION 4
HOLOCAUST INSTITUTE 2009
BRIEF FILL-OUT SURVEY ANSWERS
TO BRIEF SURVEY

 
THE LINE EXPERIMENT
QUESTION ON RAPE
SHOCK EXPERIMENT
EXPRESS OPINION


At the end of the Obedience documentary, Stanley Milgram morosely admits that human nature may not be enough to save us from our worst impulses. Certainly data from studies used to create the conformity quiz do little to contradict his assertions. Why might this be so? An ancient saying states that all that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing.

Which brings us to the next question: WHY might good people do nothing?

We might be afraid of repercussions or retaliation.
We might not understand the situation or be confused about it.
We might not think that the situation warrants intervention.
Our desire to be accepted is stronger than our desire to intervene.

And???
 
THE LINE EXPERIMENT
QUESTION ON RAPE
SHOCK EXPERIMENT
EXPRESS OPINION


1. Imagine that an inexperienced person in a psychological experiment was asked to publicly match the line on the left to one of three lines on the right (Line A). Prior to this person announcing their decision, five people immediately before them all pick the wrong line (say line "B"). About what percent of inexperienced psychological subjects do you feel would just "go along" with the group and also announce the wrong decision?
 

  _____PERCENT (or  [    ] Almost no one would do this)
 
 
_______
|       |
|       |
|       |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|___|___|
 _______________________
|                       |
|           |           |
|           |           |
|    |      |           |
|    |      |           |
|    |      |           |
|____|______|_______|___|
LINE TO MATCH
LINE A   LINE B  LINE C

 
WHAT INSTITUTE PARTICIPANTS SAID IN 2009

Range =  this percentage ranged from 1 to 100 percent.
The arithmetic mean was 59 percent. The median was 70 percent.
35 people answered this question.
These figures are more optimistic than 2008 Institute participants--breaking a three year cycle of increasing cynicism.

WHAT INSTITUTE PARTICIPANTS SAID IN 2008

Range = this percentage ranged from 0 percent to 100 percent.
The arithmetic mean was 62 percent. The median was 80 percent.
40 people answered this question.

This classic study by Solomon Asch was first conducted in the late 1940s. Approximately 40% of the answers given conformed to the wrong answer given by the confederate "group majority." Steve McDonald, a recent doctorate at Florida State University's Sociology Department,(now on the North Carolina State faculty)  replicated this study using Tallahassee students and residents--his findings were almost identical to those of Asch's studies using Pennsylvania students over 50 years earlier.




2. About what percent of college men do you feel would say that they would rape a woman if they "could get away with it"?
 

_____PERCENT (or  [    ] Almost no college men would say this)
 
 
WHAT INSTITUTE PARTICIPANTS SAID IN 2009

Range =  this percentage ranged from 1 percent to 80 percent.
The arithmetic mean was 31 percent. The median was 25 percent.
36 people answered this question.
These figures are identical to those for the 2008 Institute participants.


 
WHAT INSTITUTE PARTICIPANTS SAID IN 2008

Range =  this percentage ranged from 0 percent to 100 percent.
The arithmetic mean was 31 percent. The median was 25 percent.
40 people answered this question.
These figures are within sampling error of those for the 2007 Institute participants and are a bit more optimistic.

This survey of male undergraduates at several colleges in the early 1980s, found that 50 percent said they would rape a woman if they felt they would not be caught. The findings are important because they illustrate what "normal people" might do (this was a hypothetical situation) if repercussions and personal responsibility are removed from their actions, comparable to the Milgram study of naive psychological subjects shocking "learners" in a supposed experiment about the effects of punishment on learning.

Philip Zimbardo's research has found that psychological subjects who are "deindividuated" by wearing hoods over their heads are much more likely to shock others, and to shock them more severely.

Visit Philip Zimbardo's Web site to learn more about this deindividuation study, as well as the Haney, Banks and Zimbardo "prison study," and more about "deindividuation."



3. About what percent of people do you feel would shock their partner in a laboratory experiment up to 450 volts of electricity simply because an experimenter asked them to?

  _____PERCENT (or  [    ] Almost no one would do this)
 
 
WHAT INSTITUTE PARTICIPANTS SAID IN 2009

Range = This percentage ranged from 1 percent to 95 percent.
The arithmetic mean was 53 percent. The median was 60 percent.
36 people answered this question.
These figures were decidedly more optimistic than in 2008, again breaking a three-year cycle of cynicism.

 
WHAT INSTITUTE PARTICIPANTS SAID IN 2008

Range = This percentage ranged from 1 percent to 100 percent.
The arithmetic mean was 62 percent. The median was 70 percent.
40 people answered this question.
These figures were decidedly more pessimistic than in 2007.

The late Stanley Milgram's studies of obedience to authority were conducted during the early to mid-1960s. In the situation depicted in this documentary, Obedience, about 65 percent of naive subjects shocked bogus laboratory subjects with 450 volts of electricity because the experimenter insisted that "the experiment must continue" when the experiment took place at Yale (it was 50% in the rundown Bridgeport office). In this, the most famous condition which you viewed on the Obedience tape, the confederate complains of a heart condition and demands the experiment must be stopped. One half to two-thirds of the naive participants continued anyway.

Human subjects regulations make it unlikely that the "Milgram experiment" could be replicated in the United States today. However, research in some other countries, such as Australia, indicate that conformity to legitimate authority remains high.

Dr. Milgram introduced conditions, such as meeting the victim, or listening to his moans--and screams--of pain, because when participants neither saw nor heard the victim, nearly 100 percent shocked the laboratory "learner" at the maximum level of 450 volts.

In further research, Dr. Milgram conducted experiments about how many people on a New York subway would give up their seats, just because a stranger asked them to. (Most would but his graduate students felt terrible asking.)

Other studies by other researchers had a blue uniformed (no insignia) versus ununiformed men asking random walkers in a parking lot to put a quarter in a stranger's meter. Compliance increased sharply when the man wore a uniform.



4. Suppose an individual held an opinion that made the people around her or him feel uncomfortable. About what percent of adult Americans do you feel would say "it's important to stand up for your opinions" (instead of saying "keep your opinions to yourself if they make other people uncomfortable")?

                ______PERCENT

[    ] Almost no one would say to stand up for your own opinions
[    ] Almost everyone would say to stand up for your own opinions
 
 
WHAT INSTITUTE PARTICIPANTS SAID IN 2009

Range = This percentage from 1 to 99 percent.
The arithmetic mean was 41 percent. The median was 35 percent.
36 people answered this question.
These percentages were slightly more optimistic than those in 2008.


 
WHAT INSTITUTE PARTICIPANTS SAID IN 2008

Range = This percentage from 1 to 100 percent.
The arithmetic mean was 35 percent. The median was 25 percent.
40 people answered this question.
These percentages were statistically comparable to those in 2007.

In a national, representative survey of Americans conducted by the National Opinion Research Corporation (the General Social Survey of 1993), 55 percent said that it was important to stand up for your opinions but over one-third (38 percent) answered that it was better to keep your views to yourself if they made others uncomfortable.

In a different General Social Survey question, asked in 1985, 1990, and 1996, however, about 40 percent each year said that people should obey the law without exception, while about 52 percent answered that exceptional circumstances might mean that people would have to follow their consciences, even if that meant breaking a law. When the question was repeated in 2006, now 53% said that people should obey the law without question.



This year's Institute participants were decidedly more optimistic than those in 2007 and 2008!

Where zero is no relationship at all, and 1 means "perfect prediction,"  here are the correlations among the answers for these four questions among  the 36 Institute 2009 participants. Two correlations were statistically significant.

Participants who felt more naive subjects would conform on the line experiment also tended to believe that:

Participants who more often felt college men would rape if they could "get away with it" also estimated that


2008 DATA
  Line Study Rape Question Shock Study Stand up for
Opinions
Line Study  1.00      
Rape Question  0.51*   1.00    
Shock Study  0.30   0.18  1.00  
Stand up for Opinions  -0.21  -0.43* -0.10 1.00
*correlation is  reliably different from zero (p < .05)
 
 
TO THINK ABOUT

Although adolescence and early adulthood are often thought of as times of rebellion and disobedience, we also know that on the average, young adults rate their parents as their "most admired people." This is also a time of life when peer groups and peer group acceptance and approval are critically important to the individual.

What kinds of conformity behavior do you notice among your students? How prevalent are these behaviors?

What kinds of these conformity behaviors could be harmful to others?

Has any kind of bullying (verbal, emotional, or physical) been an issue in your school?
If so, what was done about this bullying?
What do students think should be done?
How can students open up and disclose that bullying has occurred?
Here's a web site with a lot of resources about bullying that your students may find helpful:

http://www.safeyouth.org/scripts/topics/bullying.asp

Suppose your students saw a behavior that was not only illegal, but harmful to themselves or others, such as drug use or assault. What do you think would be the most likely responses of the students observing such behavior?



Florida State University's Holocaust Institute

ONLINE RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO YOU! CLICK HERE
 
 
PRESENTATION 4
HOLOCAUST INSTITUTE 2009

Susan Carol Losh
Department of Educational Psychology
    and Learning Systems
Florida State University
Tallahassee, FL 32306-4453

  slosh@fsu.edu

June 25 2009
This page was built with Netscape Composer.
All charts were constructed using the SPSS program.